<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">This manuscript is timely and significant since it explores responses to confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic. It expands a practical understanding of the topic, with particular emphasis on the Honduran context.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">The manuscript is based on empirical evidence with a qualitative approach. The sampling technique for such methodology was appropriately selected, and the findings were contextualized in the previous literature. However, since this study took place in Honduras, it would be interesting to expand on the Honduran health context.</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">The paper is well written, grammatically correct, and very well organized. However, there are a few things that I would suggest addressing before publication:</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">1. The paper was sometimes wordy. For example: “</span><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Además, a manera de conclusión, puede decirse que las personas que participaron en este estudio tienen dos tipos de preocupaciones fundamentales en relación con la situación provocada por la COVID-19.”&nbsp;</span></strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">There are simpler ways to say this.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">2. When the authors say that they are studying "<strong>significados y experiencias de la preocupación por la COVID-19",</strong> it is difficult for the reader to understand what they mean by the terms "<strong>significados y experiencias,</strong>" and probably "preocupación." Those terms could mean multiple things for the reader and should be operationalized in the document.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">3. The abstract should say that this study was conducted in Honduras to contextualize the reader.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">4. It would be useful for the reader to have a definition of <strong>"cuarentena, aislmaiento, distanciamiento social y confinamiento"</strong> in the context of COVID-19.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">5. Was this study approved by an Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee? It should be added to the methods section.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">6. The authors should expand the limitation section to address non-probabilistic sampling. It should also state that although it was conducted in Honduras, it does not represent all Hondurans' reality.</span></p>