<p>Dr. Farah A Ibrahim:<br><br>I believe that you would serve as an excellent reviewer of the manuscript, "A Admiration in adolescents’ judgments on situations involving hurting," which has been submitted to Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology. The submission's abstract is inserted below, and I hope that you will consider undertaking this important task for us.<br><br>Please log into the journal web site by 2021-03-07 to indicate whether you will undertake the review or not, as well as to access the submission and to record your review and recommendation.<br><br>The review itself is due 2021-03-21.<br><br>Submission URL: <a href='https://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP/reviewer/submission?submissionId=1489&reviewId=1005&key=6966tQ' class='submissionReviewUrl-style-class'>https://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP/reviewer/submission?submissionId=1489&reviewId=1005&key=6966tQ</a><br><br>Thank you for considering this request.<br><br>Dr. Melissa L. Morgan<br>University of California Santa Barbara<br>mmorgan@education.ucsb.edu<br><br><br><br>"A Admiration in adolescents’ judgments on situations involving hurting"<br><br>Abstract</p>
<p>This article aims to characterize the judgments about situations that involve hurting and to compare judgments made to generic actors and to idols. Two questionnaires were applied: sociodemographic and the interference of admiration, in 63 adolescents aged between 12 and 18 years. Data analysis included the creation of a coding system based on dialogical reliability, and the execution of descriptive and inferential statistics tests. The results show that admiration did not interfere with the judgments in three of four situations involving hurting and indicated that most adolescents judged the situations with justifications that did not consider concern about hurting others.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">&nbsp;</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p align="center"><strong><span lang="PT-BR">Guidelines for Review of Manuscripts Submitted to Revista Interamericana de Psicologia (English)</span></strong></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">Although most authors appreciate receiving the reviewer’s comments, it is especially important to provide the rationale for resubmissions or rejections. </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(1) Originality. The manuscript offers a timely, new and significant contribution to Interamerican psychology.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">The manuscript expands the theoretical, empirical, and practical understanding of the topic.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(2) Research [if applicable].&nbsp; If the manuscript is based on empirical evidence, does the quantitative or qualitative methodology fit the research question(s)? Are the sampling techniques, systematic data collection, and data analysis appropriate for the study? Do the data support the findings? Are findings contextualized in light of previous literature?</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(3) Theory [if applicable]. The manuscript is based upon a systematic and reflective examination of one or more literature of theoretical or conceptual perspectives.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(4) Practice [if applicable]. The manuscript provides information that will be useful in the practice of psychology by a targeted audience and/or the interdisciplinary readership of the journal. The content may include, but is not limited to, case studies, narratives of supervision, or demonstration projects. Implications for supervision, practice or further research in clinical, organizational, and educational settings are discussed.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(5) Literature Review.&nbsp; Author(s) critically review relevant literature and demonstrate an understanding of current knowledge related to the topic. Author(s) build on existing literature in formulating ideas for this submission.</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(6) Writing. Is the manuscript well written, grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, cohesive, and logically organized? Are conclusions stated clearly? Do the author(s) appropriately reference primary and secondary sources, and indicate any headings and sub-headings, using the style of the current APA publication manual? Feel free to directly correct any English and make suggestions for clarity. &nbsp;</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">(7) Are there are other papers by Interamerican authors, which are pertinent and might be cited in this manuscript?</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span lang="PT-BR">&nbsp;</span></p>
</div><br/><p>The following message is being delivered on behalf of Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology. ______________________________________</p>
<div>
<div id="Zm-_Id_-Sgn" data-zbluepencil-ignore="true">
<div><strong><span class="size">Dr. Fernando Andres Polanco</span></strong></div>
<div><em>Editor</em></div>
<div><a href="mailto:fernando.polanco@sipsych.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fernando.polanco@sipsych.org</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Sociedad Interamericana de Psicología</div>
<div>Web:&nbsp;<a href="http://sipsych.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://sipsych.org</a>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><a href="https://www.facebook.com/sipsych/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook</a>&nbsp; |&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/sipsych" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Twitter</a> &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/sipsych/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Instagram</a>&nbsp; |&nbsp; <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/SIPChannel2013" target="_blank" rel="noopener">YouTube</a></div>
</div>
</div>