<p>The article presents an original work on an emergent research area, i.e. the influence of tecnhology on work-related stress.</p>
<p>Nonethless, a substancial revision is required before publication.</p>
<p>1) The article does not present the state-of-the art on the subject and most of the bibliography is outdated;</p>
<p>2) There is an ambition to deliver a conceptual model based on technostress, work exhaustion, role conflict and distributive justice that is not credibly described and / or statistically sound. The authors should first consider to publish each of the hipotheses separetly, based on well-established psychological constructs;</p>
<p>3) There are some methodological issues concerning the way participant information is presented (e.g. participant professional experience and employment time should be presented in median not average; role assignment / job description commentary is misplaced and seems unrelated to the other variables);</p>
<p>4) The text should be revised to correct for typos (e.g. "technoestress" in english abstract; "recoemnda-se" in the discussion section) and clarify some of the terminology (e.g. what is the psychological construct of "dissabores"?).</p>