<p>(1) Originality. The manuscript offers a timely, new and significant contribution to the Interamerican psychology.</p><p>The paper expands the theoretical understanding of Pedology as a relevant topic in psychology. The paper presents an historical contribution to the analysis and development of Pedology contruct related to Vygotsky’s Theory and Ardonios´multi-referential approach; but, It is not clear the new and significant contribution to Interamerican psychology of the paper. Also, there is not sufficient argument that could expand the empirical and practice understanding of the topic.</p><p>(2) Research [if applicable].  If the paper is based upon empirical evidence, does the quantitative or qualitative methodology fit the research question(s). Are the sampling techniques, systematic  data collection, and data analysis appropriate for the study? Do the data support the findings? Are findings contextualized in  light of previous literature?</p><p>Not applicable</p><p>(3) Theory [if applicable]. This paper is based upon a systematic and reflective examination of one or more literatures of theoretical or conceptual perspectives.</p><p>The paper is based in Vygotsky’s theory and Ardonios´multi-referential approach.</p><p>(4) Practice [if applicable]. The manuscript provides information that will be useful in the practice of psychology by a targeted audience and/or the interdisciplinary readership of the journal. The content may include but is not limited to case studies, narratives of supervision, or demonstration projects. Implications for supervision practice in clinical, organizational, and educational settings are discussed.</p><p>Not applicable.</p><p>(5) Literature Review.  Author(s) critically review relevant literature and demonstrate understanding of current knowledge related to the topic. Author(s) build on existing literature in formulating ideas for this submission.</p><p>Author(s) critically review relevant literature and build on existing literature in formulating ideas for the paper.</p><p>(6) Writing. Is the manuscript well written, grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, cohesive, and logically organized? Are conclusions stated clearly? Do the author(s) appropriately reference primary and secondary sources using the APA publication manual?</p><p>In general, the manuscript is well written in APA style. However, is recommended that Author(s) expand their conclusions and explain the theoretical and epistemological implications of the analysis presented.</p><p> </p><p>(6) There are other papers by Interamerican authors, mentioned in my additional comments, which are pertinent and might be cited from this manuscript.</p><p>The next Interamerican Journals´s papers could be cited in the manuscript:</p><p>Hac, P., &amp; Ardila, A. (1977). El sistema de ideas psicológicas de Vigotsky y su lugar en el desarrollo de la psicología. <em>Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología</em>,<em> 9</em>(2), 283-299.</p><p>Rodríguez Arocho, W. C. (1999). El legado de Vygotski y de Piaget a la educación. <em>Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología</em>, <em>31</em>(3), 477-489.</p><p>The manuscript submitted could be published if the author(s) attend to the recommendations given.</p>