<p>The article is generally well structured and its content is very relevant.<br>Aspects such as writing, punctuation and citation standards according to APA style should be reviewed.</p>
<p>If the results correspond to a preliminary phase, as mentioned in the manuscript, the title should be modified mentioning this.</p>
<p>It is important to maintain clarity throughout the document and unify when mentioning data referring to El Paso (Texas) and Juarez (Mexico) because sometimes they are confused.</p>
<p>Regarding the description of the study variables, the difference between the subscales or dimensions and the title of the questionnaires with which they are measured should be clarified, because sometimes are used the concepts of burnout, secondary trauma, compassion satisfaction, and sometimes the concept of quality of life is included, which corresponds to the title of the questionnaire&nbsp;and not to the study variable as such.</p>
<p>Although the analyses and results are described in a broad and detailed manner, a discussion of these, supported by previous theories and studies, is lacking.&nbsp;The section described as discussion corresponds more to the conclusions section.</p>