Dear Editor,

We appreciate the careful observations of the reviewers. We think that the manuscript has been improved substantially with their valuable input.
We have taken care of every one of them.
1.	Adequate comments on the design are related to the scope and limitations of the study. Therefore, we have clarified the approach to the problem with a new formulation (p. 5).
2.	We added to the discussion the need for future studies (p. 16) that would allow comparisons, as the reviewer suggested it.
3.	We clarify the reason why one group is larger than another (pp. 7-8).
4.	We clarify that the instructor is not the teacher of the participants (p. 8).
5.	We add a paragraph with the ethical procedure (p. 7).
6.	We integrate within the document the figures and tables that describe the programs (p. 8,9,10,14,15)
7.	We simplify the subtitles in the results section (p. 12,13,14)
8.	We have added a paragraph justifying the use of ANCOVA analysis (p. 14). 
In addition, we believe that these last two points help clarify that the first two analyses were made with t test, and the third with ANCOVA.
9.	New paragraphs were added to the discussion with the statment that CBT does not add effects to intervention with positive psychology (p 16,17).
_______________________________________________
Edil Torres Rivera, Ph.D., Editor
Interamerican Journal of Psychology
http://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP