Autor (2012)
Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters
Barry, H  & Tyler, T.R (2009). The Other Side of Injustice. When Unfair Procedures Increase Group-Serving Behavior. Psychological Science, 20(8), pp.1023-1032. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02404.x
Blader, S. L. & Tyler, T. R. (2003). Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a "Fair" Process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin; 29 (6), pp.747-758. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006007
Blader, S. L. & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and Extending the Group Engagement Model: Linkages Between Social Identity, Procedural Justice, Economic Outcomes, and Extrarole Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (2), pp.445–464. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013935
Comisión de Enlace Institucional, AAM-SAIMO-CEIM (2006). Nivel Socio Económico 2006. Recuperado en diciembre de 2008 de http://www.saimo.org.ar/socios/Socios/NSE2006-23nov2006-Informe_final.pdf
Corporación Latinobarómetro (2009). Informe 2009. Recuperado el 20 de Enero de 2011, del sitio web de la Corporación Latinobarómetro: http://www.latinobarometro.org/latino/latinobarometro.jsp
Corporación Latinobarómetro (2011). Informe 2011. Recuperado el 20 de Junio de 2012, del sitio web de la Corporación Latinobarómetro: http://www.latinobarometro.org/latino/latinobarometro.jsp
Correia, I. (2010). Psicologia Social da Justiça: Fundamentos e desenvolvimentos teóricos e empíricos. Análise Psicológica, 28 (1), pp. 7-28
De Cremer, D. y Tyler, T. R. (2007). The Effects of Trust in Authority and Procedural Fairness on Cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology; 92 (3), pp.639-649. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639
Garzón, A. (2004): Creencias en la Justicia. Contexto Social y Político. Boletín de Psicología, 82, pp. 77-95
George, D. y Mallery, M. (2003). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hinds, L. & Murphy, K. (2007). Public Satisfaction With Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy. The australian and new zealand journal of criminology, 40 (1), pp. 27–42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/acri.40.1.27
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyley, R. H. (Ed.) Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Kazemi, A. y Törnblom, K. (2008). Social Psychology of justice: origins, central issues, recent developments, and future directions. Nordic Psychology, 60 (3), pp. 209-234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.60.3.209
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Lind, H; Tyler, T. R. & Huo, J. (1997). Procedural Context and Culture: Variation in the Antecedents of Procedural Justice Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(4), pp.767-780. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.767
Mondak, J. J. (1994). Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The sources and contexts of Legitimation. Political Research Quarterly, 47 (3), pp.675-692. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448848
Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-compliance. Journal of law and society, 32 (4), pp. 562-589. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2005.00338.x
Oviedo, H. C. & Campo-Arias, A. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34 (4), pp. 572-580.
Pérez, E.; Medrano, L. A. & Sánchez Rosas, J. (2013). El Path Analysis: conceptos básicos y ejemplos de aplicación.  Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5 (1), pp. 52-66 
Pilatti, A.; Godoy, J. & Brussino, S. (2012). Análisis de factores que influyen sobre el uso de alcohol de niños: un path análisis prospectivo. Health and Addictions / Salud y Drogas, 12(2), pp. 155-192
Thibaut, J. y Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: a Psychological Analysis. Nueva York: Erlbaum Halstead
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law?  Estados Unidos: Yale University Press.
Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological Models of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (5), pp. 850-863. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.850
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure. International journal of psychology, 35 (2), pp. 117-125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/002075900399411
Tyler, T. R. (2009). Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: What shapes rule-following in a period of transition? Australian Journal of Psychology, 61 (1), pp. 32–39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049530802607639
Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press, 2000.
Tyler, T. R. & Blader, S. L (2003). The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7 (4), pp. 349–361. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
Van Prooijen, J. W. (2009). Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (6), pp. 1166–1180. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014153
Van Prooijen, J. W.; Van den Bos, K. & Wilke, H.A.M (2004). The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: towards theoretical integration. European review of social psychology, 15, pp. 33–58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463280340000108
Van Prooijen, J. W.; Van den Bos, K. & Wilke, H.A.M (2007). Procedural justice in authority relations: the strength of outcome dependence influences people's reactions to voice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), pp. 1286-1297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.435