Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5.0. Chicago: SmallWaters.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999a). Essentials of human memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999b). Memoria humana: Teoría y práctica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana de España.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working Memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working Memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2010). Working Memory. Current Biology, 20(4), 136-140. 
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158-173. 
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
Barreyro, J. P., Cevasco, J., Burin, D., & Molinari, C. (2012). Working Memory Capacity and Individual Differences in the Making of Reinstatement and Elaborative Inferences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 471-479. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38857
Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Glynn, S. M., & Hemphill, D. (1990). The impact of inferences on instructional text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 53-69). New York: Academic Press.
Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory and Cognition, 23, 735-748. doi: 10.3758/BF03200926
Cain, K., Bryan, P., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
Calvo, M. G. (2004). Relative contribution of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span to elaborative inferences in reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.07.002
Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. V. (2013). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Oxford: Routledge.
Currie, N. K., & Cain, K. (2015). Children’s inference generation: The role of vocabulary and working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 137, 57–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.005
Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435-452. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Word structure, collocation, grammar, and meaning. In M. McCarthy & N. Schmidt (Eds.), Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 122-139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, N. C., & Sinclair, S. G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 234-250. doi: 10.1080/027249896392883
Estevez, A., & Calvo, M. G. (2002). Context constraints, prior vocabulary knowledge and on-line inferences in reading. Psicothema, 14(2), 357-362. 
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Working memory and language. East Sussex.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). Activating knowledge of fictional characters’ emotional states. In C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 141-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Graesser, A. C., Leon, J. A., & Otero, J. C. (2002). Introduction to the psychology of science text comprehension. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon & G. A. C. (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gromley, J., Snyder-Hogan, L., & Luciw-Dubas, U. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientifc text: A domain-specific test of the direct an inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687-700. 
Hair, F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hannon, B. (2012). Understanding the Relative Contributions of Lower Level Word Processes, Higher Level Processes, and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension Performance in Proficient Adult Readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 125-152. doi: 10.1598/0710.33
Harrington, D. (2008). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & KimLaw, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261-276. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
Kendeou, P., Rapp, D., & van den Broek, P. (2003). The influence of reader’s prior knowledge on text comprehension and learning from text. In R. Nata (Ed.), Progress in Education (Vol. 13 pp. 189-209). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577. doi: 10.3758/BF03193491
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Leon, J. A., & Peñalba, G. E. (2002). Understanding Causality and Temporal Sequence in Scientific Discourse. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon & A. Graesser (Eds.), The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlabaum.
Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse Processes, 34, 259-280. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3403_2
Loosli, S. V., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2012). Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children. Child Neuropsychology, 18(1), 62-78. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2011.575772
Lovelock, J. (2010). La Humanidad llegará al colapso cuando la tierra se caliente 5 grados. Retrieved from http://www.abc.es/20100913/ciencia/humanidad-llegara-colapso-cuando-201009131544.html
Mannes, S., & St. George, M. (1996). Effects of prior knowledge on text comprehension: A simple modeling approach. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 115-139). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51-62. doi: 10.1037/h0087352
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 141(2), 302-320. doi: 10.1037/a0025250
O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43, 121-152. doi: 10.1080/01638530709336895
O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14. 
Pérez, A. I., Paolieri, D., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2014). The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cognitive processing, 15(3), 405-413. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0611-7
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299-316. 
Rawson, K., & Kintsch, W. (2002). How does background information improve memory for the text content? Memory & Cognition, 30, 768-778. doi: 10.3758/BF03196432
Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1999). Models of Working Memory: An Introduction. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner guide to structural equation modeling: Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Singer, M., & O’Connell, G. (2003). Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 607-631. doi: 10.1080/095414400340000079
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635-654. doi: 10.1080/09658210902998047
Uplike, J. (2009). Marte y la imaginación humana. Retrieved from http://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/2009/01/01/marte_regreso_planeta_rojo.html
van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). San Diego: Academic Press.
van den Broek, P., & Kendeou, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 335-351. doi: 10.1002/acp.1418
van den Broek, P., Risden, K. C., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van den Broek, P., Rohleder, L., & Narváez, D. (1996). Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary text. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, E., & Gilabert, R. (2000). Two procedures to improve instructional text: Effects on memory and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 107-116. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.107
Vidal-Abarca, E., Reyes, H., Gilabert, R., Calpe, J., Soria, E., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). ETAT: Expository Text Analysis Tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 93-107. doi: 10.3758/BF03195428
Wang, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2013). Working memory deficits in children with reading difficulties: memory span and dual task coordination. Journal of experimental child psychology, 115(1), 188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.015
Wechsler, D. (2003). WAIS III: Test de Inteligencia para Adultos. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Wood, D. E. (2009). Modeling the relationships between cognitive and reading measures in third and fourth grade children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 96-112. doi: 10.1177/0734282908323609
Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text Comprehension. In A. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 83-121). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.