Dear Editor,<br />
<br />
We appreciate the careful observations of the reviewers. We think that the manuscript has been improved substantially with their valuable input.<br />
We have taken care of every one of them.<br />
1.	Adequate comments on the design are related to the scope and limitations of the study. Therefore, we have clarified the approach to the problem with a new formulation (p. 5).<br />
2.	We added to the discussion the need for future studies (p. 16) that would allow comparisons, as the reviewer suggested it.<br />
3.	We clarify the reason why one group is larger than another (pp. 7-8).<br />
4.	We clarify that the instructor is not the teacher of the participants (p. 8).<br />
5.	We add a paragraph with the ethical procedure (p. 7).<br />
6.	We integrate within the document the figures and tables that describe the programs (p. 8,9,10,14,15)<br />
7.	We simplify the subtitles in the results section (p. 12,13,14)<br />
8.	We have added a paragraph justifying the use of ANCOVA analysis (p. 14). <br />
In addition, we believe that these last two points help clarify that the first two analyses were made with t test, and the third with ANCOVA.<br />
9.	New paragraphs were added to the discussion with the statment that CBT does not add effects to intervention with positive psychology (p 16,17).<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
Edil Torres Rivera, Ph.D., Editor<br />
Interamerican Journal of Psychology<br />
http://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP