<p>(1) Originality. The manuscript offers a timely, new and significant contribution to the Interamerican psychology. </p><p>The paper expands the theoretical, empirical, and practice understanding of the topic.</p><p>The objective of the article was verified the association of biosocial and academic variables to Burnout occurrence in nursing students. The article is well write.</p><p>In Brazil there is a study about the association of biosocial and academic variables developed among nursing students in 2008. So, I think that is important describe why is important the development of this study, considering the 2008 publication included in the paper.</p><p>(2) Research [if applicable].  If the paper is based upon empirical evidence, does the quantitative or qualitative methodology fit the research question(s). Are the sampling techniques, systematic  data collection, and data analysis appropriate for the study? Do the data support the findings? Are findings contextualized in light of previous literature?</p><p>All students of the same university and course were invited to participate of the study, and 570 of 730 participated.  The results support the findings. The sample and analysis are simple. The discussion is well described, but simple.</p><p>In the table 2 it is not necessary the column 3 (Total) and the last line (total).</p><p>In the table 3, the authors can describe only the option (YES). The lines of NO and Total can be excluded. <br /> <br /> (3) Theory [if applicable]. This paper is based upon a systematic and reflective examination of one or more literatures of theoretical or conceptual perspectives.</p><p>Yes. I think there are others papers that can be included.<br /> <br /> (4) Practice [if applicable]. The manuscript provides information that will be useful in the practice of psychology by a targeted audience and/or the interdisciplinary readership of the journal. The content may include but is not limited to case studies, narratives of supervision, or demonstration projects. Implications for supervision practice in clinical, organizational, and educational settings are discussed.</p><p>Yes, but considering the paper of Carlotto and Camera (2008), the originality of the paper can be committed.</p><p>(5) Literature Review.  Author(s) critically review relevant literature and demonstrate understanding of current knowledge related to the topic. Author(s) build on existing literature in formulating ideas for this submission.</p><p>Yes. <br /> <br /> (6) Writing. Is the manuscript well written, grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, cohesive, and logically organized? Are conclusions stated  clearly? Do the author(s) appropriately reference primary and secondary sources using the APA publication manual?</p><p>Yes.<br /> <br /> (6) There are other papers by Interamerican authors, mentioned in my  additional comments, which are pertinent and might be cited from this manuscript.</p><p>I think the authors can do a better review in the articles of Carlotto.</p><p> </p>