The manuscript "Male Homosexuality and Lesbianism in the Academic Production of Psychology: A Systematic Bibliographic Review Between 2012-2016," which aims to identify the academic production of psychology on homosexuality and lesbianism in Latin America, Spain, and Portugal and to point out the problem addressing the issue of homosexuality without questioning heteronormativity, which according to the authors may incur in the perpetuation of stigmas and a pathologizing view of homosexuality.
The author (s) deals with a topic of great social relevance and of high interest to psychology. Besides, when doing this through a systematic search in the databases without considering the existing production on heterosexuality (which did not enter the search strategy) the author (s) make the same mistake that indicates to exist in other papers included in the review.
The time limitation imposed by the author (s) in the search (between 2012 and 2016) lacks a plausible explanation for its application; such a time limitation isn't advisable in literature reviews, given that the art's state can have changed significantly in 4 years, especially considering that we are in 2020.
Some guidelines are available with the manuscript in case the author (s) wishes to consider it.
