<p>(1) Originality. The manuscript offers a timely, new and significant contribution to the Interamerican psychology. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes.</span></p>
<p>The paper expands the theoretical, empirical, and practice understanding of the topic. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes</span></p>
<p>(2) Research [if applicable].&nbsp; If the paper is based on empirical evidence, does the quantitative or qualitative methodology fit the research question(s)? Are the sampling techniques, systematic data collection, and data analysis appropriate for the study? Do the data support the findings? Are findings contextualized in light of previous literature?<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes, but:&nbsp;&nbsp;<span lang="en" tabindex="0">In this respect, I have some questions that I would like to see improved: in fact, the statistics used are very basic and, although the sample is large, some care might have been taken in the selection of the sample, such as inclusion (only presented one - being a student in an university)&nbsp; and exclusion</span><span lang="en" tabindex="0">&nbsp;</span>criteria&nbsp;</span><span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span lang="en" tabindex="0">and testing of the power of the sample.&nbsp;</span><span lang="en" tabindex="0">In addition, the size effects for the t test should have been established.&nbsp;Table 1 would also benefit from the chi-square test and its effect size phi.&nbsp;</span></span></span></p>
<p>(3) Theory [if applicable]. This paper is based upon a systematic and reflective examination of one or more literature of theoretical or conceptual perspectives. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes, but:&nbsp;<span lang="en" tabindex="0">There are more recent papers on the subject and therefore the bibliography should be updated.</span></span></p>
<p>(4) Practice [if applicable]. The manuscript provides information that will be useful in the practice of psychology by a targeted audience and/or the interdisciplinary readership of the journal. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes.</span> The content may include but is not limited to case studies, narratives of supervision, or demonstration projects.&nbsp; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes.</span> Implications for supervision practice in clinical, organizational, and educational settings are discussed. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Not enough</span></p>
<p>(5) Literature Review.&nbsp; Author(s) critically review relevant literature and demonstrate an understanding of current knowledge related to the topic. Author(s) build on existing literature in formulating ideas for this submission. Yes</p>
<p>(6) Writing. Is the manuscript well written, grammatically correct, free of spelling errors, cohesive, and logically organized? Are conclusions stated clearly? Do the author(s) appropriately reference primary and secondary sources using the APA publication manual? <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes.</span></p>
<p>(6) There are other papers by Interamerican authors, mentioned in my additional comments, which are pertinent and might be cited from this manuscript. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Yes.</span></p>