emilio sanchez:

An initial review of "Telephone-based interventions in psychostimulants abuse treatment" has made it clear that this submission, while it is obvious that this is an important and timely study – this methodology section is a little too light and miss a number of components to make this manuscript publishable – as I read the piece it seems like it is a qualitative study, maybe a content analysis, however I unable to really see clearly what type of study this is – thus, please take a closer look at these questions/statements: 
1.	Project, study, or theory described in sufficient detail. 
2.	Methods are rigorous and adequately described
3.	Is the project or study documented in enough detail so readers understand what was done?

“METHOD
	We carried out a systematic search for studies in English language, including variables related to psychostimulants use and telephone counseling in some of the most important international databases: Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. To locate the latest research data, the search covered the period January 2000 to November 2016. A combination of the following descriptors I was used: abuse, addiction, psychostimulant, cocaine, treatment, telephone counselling.”
_______________________________________________
Edil Torres Rivera, Ph.D., Editor
Interamerican Journal of Psychology
http://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP